Here’s an uncomfortable truth: right now, somewhere in Australia, an RTO is delivering a unit of competency it has no legal authority to deliver. The trainer is qualified. The students are engaged. The assessment is solid. And the whole thing is non-compliant.
Not because anyone set out to break the rules. But because of one of the most misunderstood concepts in the entire VET sector: imported units and the scope of registration.
If you import an elective unit from outside a qualification’s home training package and it is not explicitly on your scope, you cannot deliver it, assess it, or issue a statement of attainment for it. And as of ASQA’s fact sheet update, the regulator has drawn this line brighter and harder than ever before.
This article breaks the whole thing down in plain language — what’s allowed, what’s not, where RTOs trip up, and exactly what to do about it. If you deliver, market, or sign off on training products, read this to the end.
The One-Sentence Version
If a unit is NOT a core unit, NOT a named elective inside a qualification on your scope, and NOT already explicitly on your scope, you must apply to ASQA and be approved BEFORE you deliver or assess it. No exceptions.
Delivering an off-scope imported unit is a direct compliance breach, and any statements of attainment issued for it may be invalid.
Australian qualifications are built with flexibility on purpose. Packaging rules let you mix core units (compulsory for everyone) with elective units (where there’s a choice). That flexibility is one of the best features of the VET system — it lets you tailor a qualification to what industry and students actually need.
Sometimes the packaging rules let you select elective units from OUTSIDE the qualification’s home (or “host”) training package. When you reach outside the host package to bring a unit in, that unit is called an imported unit.
Example: You’re delivering a business qualification, and its packaging rules allow you to import a WHS or IT unit from another training package to suit a particular employer. That imported unit can be a perfectly valid choice — IF you handle scope correctly.
Three Tests Every Imported Elective Must Pass
1. Relevance — the unit must be genuinely relevant to the qualification and its vocational outcome.
2. AQF integrity — it must maintain the integrity of the AQF qualification level (you can’t use a low-level unit to pad out a diploma).
3. Industry-supported outcome — it must contribute to a valid, industry-supported vocational outcome.
Pass all three, and the unit is a legitimate choice. But the legitimacy of CHOICE is not the same as AUTHORITY to deliver. That comes from scope.
This is where the sector gets it wrong, again and again. People assume that because a qualification’s packaging rules ALLOW an imported unit, they’re automatically free to deliver it. They are not.
The scope of registration is defined under the National Vocational Education and Training Regulator Act 2011 as “the things that an organisation is registered to do.” If a unit is not within your scope, you are not registered to do it — no matter how relevant, how well-resourced, or how well-intentioned.
Here is the clean decision rule:
There is one legitimate shortcut, and it’s worth understanding precisely. If a unit is already embedded within a qualification that ASQA has approved within your scope, that unit is implicitly on your scope. You can deliver and assess it as part of OTHER qualifications, or as a standalone unit, without notifying or reapplying to ASQA.
In other words, scope attaches to the unit once it sits inside an approved qualification on your register. The trap is assuming a unit is implicitly on scope when it isn’t. Always check the national register (training.gov.au) before you rely on this.
Compliant Scenario
Your RTO has Qualification A on scope, which includes Unit X as a named elective. Six months later, you want to deliver Unit X as a standalone short course. Because Unit X is already on your scope through Qualification A, you can deliver it standalone without reapplying. Compliant.
Non-Compliant Scenario (the common one)
Your RTO has Qualification B on scope. Its packaging rules permit importing Unit Y from another training package. Unit Y is NOT on your scope and is NOT embedded in any other qualification on your scope. You enrol students and start delivering Unit Y because “the packaging rules allow it.”
This is non-compliant. The packaging rules permitting the CHOICE do not put the unit on your SCOPE. You needed to apply to ASQA and be approved first. Any statements of attainment issued for Unit Y may be invalid.
On 19 September 2025, ASQA updated its “Delivering elective units” fact sheet. For many experienced practitioners, it landed hard because it closed a door some had been using for years.
The clarified position is blunt: if you import an elective unit of competency from outside the host training package — whether you intend to deliver it inside a qualification OR as a standalone skill set — the unit must already be explicitly listed on your scope of registration before any delivery or assessment occurs.
Practically, that means the path from “employer asks for a unit” to “unit delivered in class” now runs through a formal gate: a change-of-scope application, evidence that proves your capability, and ASQA’s approval timeline.
Why ASQA Hardened the Line
Authenticity: Imported units have always required you to meet the OTHER package’s assessment conditions, resource profile, and trainer requirements. Tying delivery to scope status forces those questions to the front — before enrolment — instead of being justified after the fact.
Integrity: While most providers imported units to solve real industry problems, a minority used packaging to claim breadth they weren’t resourced to deliver. The bright-line rule removes the ambiguity that allowed it.
Treat 19 September 2025 as the operative date for audit expectations.
Some units are linked to a licence or a regulatory outcome — for example, the “Licence to operate a forklift” units in the TLI Transport and Logistics Training Package (high-risk work licences and similar). These carry extra weight because getting them wrong doesn’t just create a compliance problem — it can put a person into a licensed, high-risk job without the assurance the licence is supposed to provide.
For these units, special arrangements often exist between the relevant industry regulator and ASQA to ensure the quality of student outcomes.
Before delivering any licensing-linked or regulatory unit, you must check both ASQA’s requirements AND the relevant state/industry regulator’s additional requirements.
Licensing Units — Non-Negotiables
This means successful RTOs will be those that get a unit onto your scope, but it is not the finish line. In ALL cases, you must be able to demonstrate that you can deliver and assess every unit on your scope. That means:
This is why imported units carry a hidden cost. A unit borrowed from another package brings that package’s resource and trainer requirements with it. If you can’t meet them, you shouldn’t be delivering the unit — even if it’s technically on scope.
Your 4-Step Compliance Routine for Any Elective
No. Packaging rules tell you which units you are PERMITTED to select. They do not put the unit on your scope. If the imported unit is not explicitly on your scope (or implicitly on scope via another approved qualification), you must apply to ASQA and be approved before delivering or assessing it.
‘On scope’ (explicit) means the unit is listed on your scope of registration on the national register. ‘Implicitly on scope’ means the unit is embedded as a core or named elective within a full qualification that IS on your scope. In that case, you can deliver the unit — inside other qualifications or standalone — without reapplying. Always verify on training.gov.au rather than assuming.
Yes — if the unit is a core unit or a named elective within the packaging rules of a qualification on your scope, you can deliver it standalone and issue a statement of attainment without applying to ASQA. If it’s NOT a core or named elective within an on-scope qualification, you cannot — you must have it explicitly added to scope first.
The 19 September 2025 ASQA fact sheet update makes the rule explicit and is the operative date for audit expectations. ‘We’ve always done it this way’ is not a defence. Run a cross-qualification elective audit now and rectify any off-scope delivery before it surfaces in an audit, complaint, or tip-off.
You are delivering outside your registration — a direct breach of your obligations as an RTO. Statements of attainment issued for the off-scope unit may be invalid, which exposes students (who may have paid for and relied on a worthless credential), exposes you to rectification and regulatory action, and damages your reputation. For licensing-linked units, the consequences can be far more serious.
It varies. Straightforward additions can be relatively quick, but where ASQA requires evidence of capability — or a performance assessment — applications can take significantly longer (in some cases up to around six months). Build this lead time into your planning. You cannot enrol or deliver while you wait.
Yes. Units linked to licensed or regulatory outcomes (such as the TLI ‘Licence to…’ high-risk work units) often have special arrangements between the industry regulator and ASQA. You must meet both ASQA’s scope requirements AND the relevant licensing regulator’s additional requirements before delivering. Verify everything; assume nothing.
No. Being on scope is necessary but not sufficient. You must also demonstrate you have the appropriate trainers and assessors, facilities, resources, and assessment systems for that specific unit — meeting the assessment conditions of the unit’s own training package. On scope without capability is still non-compliant.
Check your scope of registration on the national register at training.gov.au. This is the single source of truth. If a unit isn’t explicitly listed and isn’t a core/named elective within a qualification that is listed, treat it as NOT on scope until proven otherwise.
Flexibility in packaging is a gift to the sector — it lets us build training that fits real jobs. But the flexibility of CHOICE was never the flexibility of AUTHORITY. Authority comes from scope, and scope comes from ASQA.
The providers who get caught are rarely the bad actors. They’re the well-meaning ones who confused “the packaging rules allow it” with “I’m registered to deliver it.” Don’t be that provider.
Action today: pull your scope from training.gov.au, list every elective you’re currently delivering across all qualifications, and flag any imported or standalone units that aren’t explicitly or implicitly on scope. Rectify before someone else finds it.
Disclaimer:
The information presented on the VET Resources blog is for general guidance only. While we strive for accuracy, we cannot guarantee the completeness or timeliness of the information. VET Resources is not responsible for any errors or omissions, or for the results obtained from the use of this information. Always consult a professional for advice tailored to your circumstances.
Ben Thakkar is a Compliance, Training, and Business specialist in the education industry. He has held senior management roles, including General Manager, with leading Registered Training Organisations (RTOs) and Universities. With over 15 years of experience, Ben brings extensive expertise across audits, funding contracts, VET Student Loans, CRICOS, and the Standards for RTOs 2025.
By submitting this form, you agree to the VET Resources Privacy Policy.
